Suburban Law Enforcement Academy (SLEA) BA State Certification Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the SLEA BA State Certification Exam. Dive into interactive flashcards and multiple-choice questions, with hints and detailed explanations. Ace your certification!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


What type of immunity protects police officers while giving testimony in court?

  1. Absolute immunity

  2. Qualified immunity

  3. Statutory immunity

  4. Transactional immunity

The correct answer is: Qualified immunity

The type of immunity that protects police officers while giving testimony in court is qualified immunity. This legal doctrine is designed to shield public officials, including law enforcement officers, from personal liability for actions taken while performing their official duties, as long as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known. Qualified immunity allows officers to perform their roles without the constant threat of being sued for damages related to their testimony or actions taken during the course of their duties. It recognizes that during their work, officers must often make quick decisions in stressful situations, and it protects them from legal consequences as long as they act in good faith and within the bounds of established law. The other forms of immunity listed do not apply in this specific context. Absolute immunity, for instance, typically applies to certain high-ranking officials and judges, and does not extend to police officers regarding testimony. Statutory immunity refers to protections provided by specific statutes rather than the broader judicial precedent that characterizes qualified immunity. Transactional immunity offers protection against being prosecuted for granted transactions but is not relevant to the context of police testimonies.